Thursday, August 27, 2009
Early New Year's Resolution
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Hotel Review: Four Seasons, Sydney
The front doors open to reveal a marbled foyer, where friendly staff offered cheerful greetings and efficient service. A piano tinkled in the background as I checked in, and I was pleasantly surprised when I was informed that the hotel was offering AUD 100 vouchers to every guest, which could be used to cover bar tabs, internet charges or any other incidentals.
At 531 rooms, the hotel is large, but my room was a short walk from the elevators, and nothing like the long trek I had to make at the Sheraton on the Park. My room, while small, was very well appointed, and offered a gorgeous view of the harbour. The king-sized bed dominated the room and was so invitingly comfortable that I was tempted to laze in bed all day, especially with the large, flat-screen TV so conveniently located just across the bed. The bathroom was finished in marble, and had a separate bathtub and shower stall. Best of all, the hotel offered a full range of L’Occitane en
Having stayed in the Four Seasons, I now understand where Sash is coming from. However, I still think I would go for a Starwoods or Hyatt hotel, just for the points!
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Hotel Review: Sheraton on the Park, Sydney, Australia
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Shoestring Guide to New York City
The bright lights of New York City beckon visitors from all four corners of the globe, but with its reputation as one of the most expensive cities in the world, is it possible to visit the Big Apple on a modest budget? The answer is a resounding yes. With lots of cheap and even free attractions in town, you don’t have to take out a second mortgage on your house to enjoy all the city has to offer.
Free sights
While there’s no such thing as a free lunch in
1. Statue of
A trip to NYC isn’t complete without visiting Lady Liberty but the $12 ferry fee to
2.
At 843 acres, Central Park is easily
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
Travel bug
Friday, April 17, 2009
It's a dog's life
Don't get me wrong - I love my dog - but honestly, isn't this the absolute height of decadence at the worst time possible?
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
The dizzying world of Malaysian politics
March 24, 2009
Scandals Cloud Succession in Newly Unsure Malaysia By THOMAS FULLERKUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — A slew of political scandals gripping Malaysia and a transfer of power fraught with uncertainty have shaken the elite here, with exquisitely poor timing.
As a major trading nation, Malaysia has been slammed by the global downturn. Its exports have collapsed by nearly one-third, and current projections show that its economy will shrink by as much as 5 percent this year.
Yet the main preoccupation of the government and opposition parties appears to be what analysts say is an increasingly dysfunctional political system. The man in line to become prime minister has been linked to the murder of a Mongolian woman whose body was obliterated with military-grade explosives.
The leader of the main opposition party awaits trial on sodomy charges, in a highly politicized case. The government is using draconian laws to prosecute other opposition figures, and last week it suspended a member of Parliament for one year after he called the prime-minister-in-waiting a murderer. And a state legislature has been paralyzed for six weeks by a dispute over who should govern.
“At the rate things are going, we’re going to be a failed state within a decade,” said Salehuddin Hashim, secretary general of the People’s Justice Party, the largest opposition party.
For Malaysia, an oil-rich country with a large, well-educated middle class, the pessimism may seem hyperbolic. But analysts say the current political woes strike at the heart of the functioning of government, damaging institutions like the royalty, the judiciary and the police.
“I see a rough ride ahead for the country,” said Zaid Ibrahim, the founder of Malaysia’s largest law firm, who resigned as law minister in September over the government’s practice of detaining its critics without trial. “The institutions of government have become so one-sided it will take years to restore professionalism and integrity.”
Much of the anxiety is focused on the rise of Najib Razak, a veteran politician in line to become prime minister sometime after the governing party’s annual general assembly, which starts Tuesday. No date for his ascension has been set, and some Malaysians speculate that the incumbent, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, will hold on to power, though he has said he will step down.
Mr. Najib’s supporters say he will reverse the sagging fortunes of the governing party, the United Malays National Organization, and offer decisive leadership, a contrast to the languid style of Mr. Abdullah. But Mr. Najib lacks popular support, and many expect further crackdowns on his opponents if he becomes prime minister. The government already seems to be taking a harder line, shutting two opposition newspapers on Monday while the police used tear gas to break up a rally by opposition leaders in the northern state of Kedah.
In a speech on Wednesday, Mr. Zaid called on the king, Mizan Zainal Abidin, to reject Mr. Najib if the party puts him forward as prime minister, and to appoint someone who would “bring us back from the brink.”
Mr. Najib declined to comment for this article.
The highest-profile scandal to tarnish his reputation is the murder of the Mongolian, Altantuya Shaariibuu, the mistress of Mr. Najib’s foreign policy adviser.
Prosecutors say Ms. Shaariibuu was killed in October 2006 by government commandos who also serve as bodyguards to the country’s top leaders.
Mr. Najib has not been charged with any crime, and he denies having known Ms. Shaariibuu or ever having met her.
According to news accounts, Ms. Shaariibuu had been seeking her share of a commission — the opposition calls it a bribe — worth about $155 million, paid by a French company as part of a deal reached by the government to buy submarines. Mr. Najib, who is defense minister as well as deputy prime minister, handled the submarine purchase.
The huge size of the commission — about 10 percent of the total cost of the submarines — is not being investigated, despite an official acknowledgment by the Malaysian government that it was made to a company linked to Mr. Najib’s aide, who was acquitted in connection with Ms. Shaariibuu’s murder.
Lawyers say the handling of the case has been irregular, and they criticize the prosecution for failing to call Mr. Najib to testify at his aide’s trial.
Perhaps more worrying for the country is the standoff in Perak, a state where since early February the police have barred lawmakers who oppose the governing party from entering government buildings.
Mr. Najib spearheaded an effort to install a new chief minister in Perak by claiming that he had enough defectors from the opposition coalition, the Pakatan Rakyat, which last year took control of the State Assembly for the first time since the country won independence from Britain in 1957.
Both sides remain at an impasse, and the sultan of Perak has rejected a plea by the speaker of the Assembly for a new election, which polls indicate would probably restore the opposition coalition to power.
Ibrahim Suffian, director of the Merdeka Center, an independent polling agency, said that as the governing party’s popularity wanes, Malaysia is failing a key test of any democracy: the peaceful transfer of power.
“Malaysian democracy hasn’t fully matured, in the sense that those who lost the elections are unwilling to accept the results,” he said. The United Malays National Organization has governed the country since independence but nearly lost power in elections last March, a watershed that put into question Malaysia’s ethnic-based party system.
Mr. Zaid, the former law minister, traces Malaysia’s current troubles to the privileges given to the country’s dominant ethnic group, the Malays. Governments led by the United Malays National Organization have provided contracts, discounts and special quotas to Malays through a far-reaching program of preferences. “We have sacrificed democracy for the supremacy of one race,” said Mr. Zaid, who himself is Malay. “It’s a political hegemony.”
The other two major ethnic groups, Chinese and Indian, have withdrawn support for the governing party in recent years and now largely back the opposition.
Declining support for the governing party has heightened the personal rivalry between Mr. Najib and Anwar Ibrahim, the opposition leader facing sodomy charges. In a measure of the political nature of the case, Mr. Anwar’s accuser met with Mr. Najib before going to the police.
“Our position vis-à-vis Najib is clear,” Mr. Anwar said in an interview. “He has become so repressive and crude in his methods.”
Mr. Anwar added, “There’s no way we will have any dealing or respect for him.”
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Six weeks in
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Protectionist tendancies
It seems like everyone agrees that in theory, no one should engage in beggar thy neighbour policies or engage in a race to the bottom. In practice, however, it's a different story. Sarkozy was caught out when he criticized French automakers for outsourcing production to the Czech Republic. Europe is now taxing American biodisel, and right here in Malaysia, we have the PM and MCA, among others, urging us to Buy Malaysian. Seems like it's alright to protest protectionism when others are threatening to implement it, and when it affects you and your exports directly, but it's ok to protect your own lot. The ironic thing is, Asean countries recently reaffirmed their commitment to anti-protectionism at the last Summit.
All these conflicting messages are giving me a headache. All I can say is, treat others like you would like to be treated yourself. It's the golden rule for a reason.
On another related note, Malaysian companies were told to retrench foreign workers first in an effort to protect Malaysian jobs. But what of Malaysians working overseas? Won't the same policies implemented overseas affect us? That kind of major job reshuffling isn't going to help anyone. It's not exactly protectionism, but the same principles apply, don't you think?
Friday, March 6, 2009
Muslim or not?
Muslims: 990
Others: 1
Congratulations to Mr. Gilbert Freeman, who, on Friday, managed to change his religion from Islam to Christian. In a country that professes to have freedom of religion, there sure isn't a lot of it if you happen to be born into the wrong one. Interestingly enough, the reason the Shariah court gave for approving the change:
The Shariah court ruled that he is not a Muslim. He is not practicing Islam, and he hasn't applied to be a Muslim.I'm not sure whether being born and brought up in a religion constitutes applying to be in that religion, but I, for one, am definitely happy that neither my parents, nor my government is forcing me to be in any religion.
From the IHT:
Malaysian wins court battle to become ChristianThe Associated PressPublished: March 6, 2000
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia: An Islamic court in Malaysia ruled Friday that a man given an Islamic name at birth was a Christian, a rare victory for religious minorities in this Muslim-majority nation.
The man — whose original identity card listed his name as "Mohammad Shah alias Gilbert Freeman" — brought his case to the Shariah court in southern Negeri Sembilan state after the National Registration Department refused to accept he was a Christian and allow him to drop his Islamic name when he applied for a new identity card.
Lawyer Hanif Hassan said his client, who is 61, was raised as a Christian by his mother, and his Islamic name came from his Muslim father, who left the family when he was only 2-months-old. Freeman is married according to Christian rites and has three children who are Christians.
"The Shariah court ruled that he is not a Muslim. He is not practicing Islam, and he hasn't applied to be a Muslim," Hanif told The Associated Press.
He said his client was happy with the Shariah court's decision.
"This is a rare case but it shows that the Shariah courts are not rigid and are able to help resolve inter-religious disputes," he said.
Malaysia has a dual court system. Muslims are governed by the Islamic Shariah courts while civil courts have jurisdiction over non-Muslims. But inter-religious disputes usually end up in Shariah courts, and end in favor of Muslims.
Religious issues are extremely sensitive in Malaysia, where about 60 percent of the 27 million people are Muslims. Buddhist, Christian and Hindu minorities have accepted Islam's dominance but in recent years voiced fears that courts are unfairly asserting the supremacy of Islam, which is Malaysia's official religion.
Freeman sought the court's help because he said he was getting old and he didn't want any confusion over whether he should receive a Christian burial after, Hanif said.
There have been several cases of Islamic authorities claiming the bodies of people they say converted secretly to Islam.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Barcelona
Dawn broke sometime during my flight from Amsterdam to Barcelona. It was a welcome sight because it meant my 15-hour flight was drawing to a close. I landed in Barcelona at 9am, bleary eyed even though I had the luxury of stretching out across two seats on the 12-hour flight from KL to Amsterdam. A few quick questions later, I found myself waiting in line for the bus to the city. The bus was comfortable enough, even though the driver short changed me by €2, something I didn't notice until several hours later.
The bus dropped me off at Plaza Catalunya, a huge plaza in the center of the city. From there, it was a 2-minute walk to my hotel. I'd booked a room in Hotel Lloret, right on La Rambla, the main tourist street in Barcelona. At €40, it was more expensive than a backpackers, but with my business clothes and laptop in tow, I didn't want to risk it. In any case, I was very happy with my room, which was clean, had an en suite bathroom and a comfortable bed, and came with breakfast and wifi too - what more could a traveller ask for?
After a quick breakfast, I set off to explore La Rambla and as much of Barcelona as I could before the jet lag kicked in. La Rambla is a hip and happening pedestrian thoroughfare flanked by two roads for cars. The nice thing about this system is that if you're walking in the middle, you don't have to stop at every junction for the cars to pass. It's filled with stalls on either side of the wide thoroughfare selling everything from iguanas to flowers and paintings. Those human statues also seem to be really popular there. It's not a very long street - it took me maybe 20 minutes tops to reach the end of the street, where it joins the coast.
My first stop of the day was La Boqueria, a market filled with local produce and eateries. I love going to grocery stores in new cities, so I had a really pleasant time strolling through the market. I came across some really bizarre sights like a goat head and something full of holes hanging from the ceiling of one of the shops. Any idea what that is?
I'd just had breakfast so I wasn't very hungry, but I did come back here the next day to El Quim, a tiny restaurant where you can only eat at the bar. Apparently the tapas here is really good, but I was distracted by the plate of octopus the couple next to me had ordered, so I got that too.
The Galician style octopus turned out to be fantastic - octopus sauteed in olive oil on top of two soft fried eggs and served with a basket of bread. Heart attack on a plate! :D
Further down La Rambla, I came across this shop
Seems like I can't get away from KL even after a 15 hour flight!
After that, map in hand, I started wandering down the streets and alleyways of Barcelona. I love how tiny alleyways open up into a large, gorgeous plazas.
I came across this restaurant in one of the plazas. Eating until you're stuffed takes on a whole new meaning at this place.
I also found this little shop that was selling "Happy Pills." Care for some, anyone?
The next day was Gaudi day. My first stop was Casa Battlo, which was only a short walk from my hotel. Also known as the House of Bones, the building was awe inspiring. All the details were so thoughtfully planned and the best part was that there were no straight lines. Everything was fluid and flowing. Gaudi used an undersea theme which meant blue tiles and blue stained glass in the windows. The effect was beautiful.
I passed by the other famous Gaudi building, La Pedrera on my way to the Sagrada Familia but decided not to go in. The Sagrada, however, is a must see. They've been working on this building for more than 200 years now and it's still not complete but it's easy to see why when you're there. It's definitely not just another cathedral. Here, again, Gaudi was inspired by nature, creating spiral staircases like those seen on a sea shell and using columns that look like trees to support the vaulted roof. One of my favourite things about the cathedral is how the light dances on the walls as it shines through the stained galss windows. If you take the lift up one of the towers, you get an amazing view of the city. Here's a tip: There are two lifts, one in front with an incredibly long line, an another, lesser known one, at the back. There's also a museum at the back, explaining Gaudi's methods and inspirations. You could probably skip that part, but I thought it made the visit more meaningful.
That night, I made my way to the Plaza Espana to see the famed magic fountains, only to discover that they were closed for maintenance. Big disappointment. I did, however, come across this little chocolate shop/patisserie that had this yummilicious flower pot on display. I thought it would make an excellent Valentines day gift.
I had tapas for dinner again that night. In fact, I had nothing but tapas my whole time in Barcelona. To be honest, I didn't find the food particularly fantastic, except for the octopus. One thing I really enjoyed, though, was the churros. One can't leave Spain without trying the churros or Spanish doughnuts.
All in all, I had a great time in Barcelona, although I wish I had someone there to share it with me. It's no fun travelling alone :(
Friday, February 20, 2009
Flying high
Five major accidents this year alone, and we’re only in mid/end February! All this at a time when I’m about to begin regular flying again. If I were a nervous flyer, I’d be shaking in my boots by now. Except I’m not a nervous flyer and I’d be crazy to wear boots in this weather. But still, none of this is very confidence-inducing.
Perhaps the only silver lining for me is that the majority of these planes are run by US airlines and I’m not about to go there anytime soon. But then again, so many of my friends are in the States. Sigh. I wonder if any of this is tied to cost-cutting measures? Because if it is, these airlines need to think seriously about what constitutes appropriate and feasible cost-cutting. General rule of thumb: Don’t skimp on anything that could threaten lives!
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
In transit again
My new office is small compared to my old office in New York. Currently there are two of us in the office, my country head and me. Luckily we share the office with another company, or to be more precise, we're squatting in their office. Luckily, this means that there are other people around, enough that we can get a lively conversation going at the lunch table, like today's one about one-handed keg stands and the workings of a beer barrel. Yes, it's good to be working with people of my age :)
This week I've been given a reprieve from travelling, allowing me time to settle down in my new office and get to know the other people. Next week, however, the airport runs start again, this time with a project in Bangkok. I'm looking forward to it, to be honest. Staying close to the office means I don't have to battle through the ridiculous traffic jams on the way to work. Luckily traffic isn't that bad on my way home. I'm not looking forward to the early morning wake up calls or the idle time waiting for planes, but I'm definitely excited about discovering a new city, getting to know new colleagues, and yes, the hotels. Oh and the food! Gotta love Thai food :D
Yes, being in transit again definitely has its plus points, best of which is... I GET PAID!
Friday, February 6, 2009
Rrrribbit
The country was in an uproar less than a year ago when the opposition managed to steal several states from under the nose of the incumbents. But now, the term "frog" isn't reserved only for the French. After three assemblymen resigned from the Pakatan team to become Independents but friendly to BN, the incumbents seem to have the majority again and have now seized the opportunity to take over the Perak government. I suppose it was the opposition's fault to start with, after all the talk back in September that they would steal enough people from BN that they would have the majority in Parliament. But no matter who started it first, this isn't the way politics should be conducted.
In Malaysia, people vote for the party just as much, if not more than we vote for the person who's running for the post. So if a politician should suddenly decide to jump ship, no matter which party (s)he's jumping to, the people should have a right to decide if they still want the person to be their representative. In short, a by-election should be called. To make things simple, perhaps the constitution should be ammended to state that anyone who decides to switch parties while holding a post in the government should give up that post and start again in his/her new party. That would get rid of the incentive to jump ship and cut down on all the bribing that's going on.
In any case, it's high time Perak, and Malaysia in general, leaves all this childishness behind and concentrate on the task at hand - leading the country out of the current economic mess. It's mind-boggling how the PM is still in denial about Malaysia being in a recession. Sure, we may not be in a technical recession, but look how long the US denied their problem and look how well that turned out.
One of the suggestions to combat this recession that we're not in is to buy Malaysian products, but I saw the most amusing article in the New Straits Times the other day about how vague the term "Made in Malaysia" actually is:
What constitutes Malaysian-made goods include pre-packed goods with the name and address of a manufacturer in Malaysia on it; products that are made, assembled and modified locally; goods that go through the final process in Malaysia; and foreign goods manufactured under licence in Malaysia.
Apparently this ranges from anything that is completely sourced from and made in Malaysia to something that is merely assembled or modified locally. In other words, that Starbucks latte in your hand is Made in Malaysia because the barrista assembled it here and so is that McDonalds burger. Oh and those Peugeot cars sold by Naza are also Made in Malaysia. Suddenly the boycott American goods campagin during the recent Gaza war just got so much harder because guess what - everything is Made in Malaysia!
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Gong xi fa cai
Happy New year, everyone. Be well, be safe, eat lots, and have fun!
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Sweatshops: A violation of human rights or the way out of poverty?
The central challenge in the poorest countries is not that sweatshops exploit too many people, but that they don’t exploit enough.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Third world politics in a first world country?
Last Sunday President-elect Barack Obama was asked whether he would seek an investigation of possible crimes by the Bush administration. “I don’t believe that anybody is above the law,” he responded, but “we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards.”I’m sorry, but if we don’t have an inquest into what happened during the Bush years — and nearly everyone has taken Mr. Obama’s remarks to mean that we won’t — this means that those who hold power are indeed above the law because they don’t face any consequences if they abuse their power.
Let’s be clear what we’re talking about here. It’s not just torture and illegal wiretapping, whose perpetrators claim, however implausibly, that they were patriots acting to defend the nation’s security. The fact is that the Bush administration’s abuses extended from environmental policy to voting rights. And most of the abuses involved using the power of government to reward political friends and punish political enemies.
At the Justice Department, for example, political appointees illegally reserved nonpolitical positions for “right-thinking Americans” — their term, not mine — and there’s strong evidence that officials used their positions both to undermine the protection of minority voting rights and to persecute Democratic politicians.
The hiring process at Justice echoed the hiring process during the occupation of Iraq — an occupation whose success was supposedly essential to national security — in which applicants were judged by their politics, their personal loyalty to President Bush and, according to some reports, by their views on Roe v. Wade, rather than by their ability to do the job.
Speaking of Iraq, let’s also not forget that country’s failed reconstruction: the Bush administration handed billions of dollars in no-bid contracts to politically connected companies, companies that then failed to deliver. And why should they have bothered to do their jobs? Any government official who tried to enforce accountability on, say, Halliburton quickly found his or her career derailed.
There’s much, much more. By my count, at least six important government agencies experienced major scandals over the past eight years — in most cases, scandals that were never properly investigated. And then there was the biggest scandal of all: Does anyone seriously doubt that the Bush administration deliberately misled the nation into invading Iraq?
Why, then, shouldn’t we have an official inquiry into abuses during the Bush years?
One answer you hear is that pursuing the truth would be divisive, that it would exacerbate partisanship. But if partisanship is so terrible, shouldn’t there be some penalty for the Bush administration’s politicization of every aspect of government?
Alternatively, we’re told that we don’t have to dwell on past abuses, because we won’t repeat them. But no important figure in the Bush administration, or among that administration’s political allies, has expressed remorse for breaking the law. What makes anyone think that they or their political heirs won’t do it all over again, given the chance?
In fact, we’ve already seen this movie. During the Reagan years, the Iran-contra conspirators violated the Constitution in the name of national security. But the first President Bush pardoned the major malefactors, and when the White House finally changed hands the political and media establishment gave Bill Clinton the same advice it’s giving Mr. Obama: let sleeping scandals lie. Sure enough, the second Bush administration picked up right where the Iran-contra conspirators left off — which isn’t too surprising when you bear in mind that Mr. Bush actually hired some of those conspirators.
Now, it’s true that a serious investigation of Bush-era abuses would make Washington an uncomfortable place, both for those who abused power and those who acted as their enablers or apologists. And these people have a lot of friends. But the price of protecting their comfort would be high: If we whitewash the abuses of the past eight years, we’ll guarantee that they will happen again.
Meanwhile, about Mr. Obama: while it’s probably in his short-term political interests to forgive and forget, next week he’s going to swear to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” That’s not a conditional oath to be honored only when it’s convenient.
And to protect and defend the Constitution, a president must do more than obey the Constitution himself; he must hold those who violate the Constitution accountable. So Mr. Obama should reconsider his apparent decision to let the previous administration get away with crime. Consequences aside, that’s not a decision he has the right to make.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
New Year at Snow
Instead, I got a gorgeous white New Year up at Kars, which means snow in Turkish. It's right on the Turkish border with Armenia and Georgia, and it's also, quite aptly, the setting of Orhan Pamuk's Snow, the 2006 Nobel Prize winning novel. Now I regret not reading it before I went.
Merve's family and I flew up to Kars on New Year's Eve. That night, the hotel we were staying at had planned a massive New Year's Eve party, complete with shiny paper hats and glittery masks.
The staff even put on their local costumes and performed these awesome dances that was sorta like the Turkish version of Irish fire dancing. Lots of fancy and fast footwork, with some spinning and whirling thrown in. At one point, one of the guys was playing with these lighted torches that turned out to be knives, which he then threw at one of his colleagues who was covered with a wooden board. They wanted to repeat the trick with a member of the audience, and guess who they picked? Merve's parents almost had a heart attack.
It was a really cool night though, filled with lots of laughter, dancing, and a massive bonfire. It's weird standing in front of a bonfire in -15C weather. One side feels like it's roasting gently while the other side is freezing.
After that, we spent 3 wonderful days skiing. I managed to pick it up after a morning of lessons. That feeling of freedom and exhiliration when you're flying down the slopes is breathtakingly awesome. Of course, it would have been nice if it were slightly warmer on the mountain. We were facing -15C temperatures, which probably dropped to -25C with wind chill on the last day. I was freezing even with four layers on. But don't worry, I still have all my toes. I counted. And no, I didn't break a leg :P I wish I had pictures of the snow, though. My camera broke just before we flew there. Sigh.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
To B or not to B?
Monday, January 12, 2009
The blame game
In a few short weeks, a war has started (although I guess technically it never ended), $50 billion has been lost to a Ponzi scheme, and another $50 billion has been stolen from American taxpayers for the Iraqi reconstruction. As a taxpayer too, I am outraged. Whatever happened to no taxation without representation? Why do I have to pay taxes there when I have no say in who gets to spend my tax dollars? I'd better get a huge refund this year.
But the article that grabbed my attention the most was one linking Chinese savings to the current economic crisis.
The problem, he said, was not that Americans spend too much, but that foreigners save too much.And who is this "he"? Ben S. Bernanke, no less. The article also goes on to state that
In hindsight, many economists say, the United States should have recognized that borrowing from abroad for consumption and deficit spending at home was not a formula for economic success.Duh. You think?
The suggested remedy was to push Beijing to revalue their currency, thus cutting the source of this drug of cheap manufactured goods. But of course it is never the average American's fault. The regulators weren't doing their job. It's those greedy people on Wall Street. It's those bloody Chinese who don't have enough confidence to spend and so they invest their savings abroad. It's not my fault even though I faked my income and got a loan I couldn't possibly afford. If the banks were willing to give me the loan, it can't be my fault, can it?
Everyone lost their heads in the enthusiasm of the recent gold rush. Except it's now the next day and we have woken up to find that all the gold has turned to lead. Yes, there are people at fault, but don't kid yourself - the multiple "people" includes ourselves and our own greed.
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Istanbul
Merve was back in Istanbul for her winter break. She's currently based in New York, where this smart cookie is scoring straight A's in her MFA at Parson's. Throughout our time at Istanbul, we stayed at her family's summer house out in the suburbs. The house is a 15 minute drive on a winding forest road away from the city, but it gets so pastoral out there that sheep and cows graze outside the house sometimes, which I was really excited about.
Istanbul is the only city in the world that spans two continents. The European side, where I spent most of my time, is separated from the Asian side (a.k.a. Anatolia) by the Bosphorus Strait, which links the Black Sea and the Marmara sea. On a bright sunny day (a rare commodity indeed, on my trip), the Bosphorus is an amazing turquoise colour. Merve and I wanted to take a ferry to the Princess Islands but the weather and the timing never worked in our favour :(
Some impressions of Istanbul:
1. It is a city of minarets. Everywhere you go, there are mosques. Some large and impressive like the Aga Sofia and the Blue Mosque (which we later found out was also known as the Sultan Ahmet mosque), and some tiny neighbourhood ones that are no less charming. There are dozens of mosques on the historical peninsula alone, but you can tell them apart by the number of minarets they have.
2. The traffic is terrible, especially when crossing the Bosphorus. We dropped Merve's friend off at her place on the Asian side of the Bosphorus once and the round trip took us about four and a half hours. Here's a tip: never cross the bridge unless you've emptied your bladder first.
I didn't think to take a picture, but here's one I found of the traffic queuing up to cross one of the Bosphorus bridges.
3. The food is amazing. There is, of course, the kebabs in all their various wonderful forms. And then there are the sweet treats, with baklava as the king. And then there are giant baked potatoes, known as kumpir, that they whip with butter and cheese in the skins before adding a vast variety of toppings, including corn, sausages, olives, walnut paste, pickles etc before topping it all off with ketchup and mayo. Fantastically delicious stuff. I'm surprised I didn't gain 10 pounds there.
4. Merve and her family assure me that the winter is not as cold, grey, drizzling and dreary as it was on my trip, and I really want to believe them. However, everyone still recommends going at any time other than the winter. Believe me, you wouldn't think it, but it DOES snow in Istanbul.
5. The Turks are awesome hosts. From Merve's wonderful family, who treated me like one of their own, to the shop owners at the Grand Bazaar, to the little cheese shop in the mountains that we visited, the Turkish hospitality was warm, genuine, and amazing.
6. Stray dogs and cats are a big problem. Some of them had diseases. One of them had scratched himself raw. Most appeared healthy and well-fed, though. The Turks may not be doing anything to keep them off the streets, but at least they feed them. Interestingly enough, the Turkish muslims don't seem to have a problem with touching dogs. Maybe that's another Malaysian taboo thing?
7. The Grand Bazaar is a must see. It's called "grand" for a reason - it's very possible to get lost in the maze of shop-lined streets there. Think of a huge building that contains 58 streets and 6,000 shops, all on one level. It's a great place for shopping. You can find anything there, from scarves and cushion covers to tea pots and glasses to antiques, and of course, carpets. If you get dehydrated wandering around in here, not to worry, because you can always duck into any shop and you will be offered some tea. Try the apple, it's delicious. Unfortunately, I don't have any pictures of the place because my battery died, but here's a photo I found on istanbulside.net.
Here's a sample of what you can get at the Grand Bazaar - I actually took this picture in one of the shops on Istiklal, the main street in Taksim, but the wares are similar.
8. I liked the Spice Bazaar more, though, simply because of the sheer variety of edible goodies that was for sale. There were all sorts of dried fruits, nuts, teas, cheeses, olives, and of course, spices. They even had stuff like soaps and henna for sale. Size-wise, it can't compare to the Grand Bazaar because it only comprises two covered lanes and one outdoors, but it felt more intimate and friendly to me.
9. The Aga Sofia (or Hagia Sophia) is another must see. Originally a church, the Aga Sofia, meaning Holy Wisdom, was constructed during the Byzantine empire around 1500 years ago. However, in 1453, Istanbul, or Constantinople at the time, was conquered by the Ottoman Turks, who converted the majestic building into a mosque as their ultimate symbol of victory. The building is now a church, and visitors can walk freely in the building, provided they put little plastic booties over their shoes.
This is the "Weeping Hole" in one of the pillars. Legend has it that if you stick your thumb in there and turn it 360 degrees while making a wish, your wish will come true if your thumb comes out wet.
10. The Turks have a love affair with water. It's very important in the Islam religion, with devotees having to wash themselves as a symbol of purification before they pray. Consequently, one can find these huge buildings, often made of marble, dotted throughout the city, usually next to a mosque. The only function of these buildings, as far as I can tell, is to provide water. The concept as a whole is great, but the thing I can't understand is - if you're going to build such a giant edifice, the sole purpose of which is to provide water, why not provide more spigots?
The building in the foreground is one of those giant tap buildings. The only spigot I saw was in the middle archway on the right. The building in the background is the local mosque. Merve's mom said they were traditionally used as meeting points so women would gossip as they lined up for their turn at the tap. It still doesn't make sense to me.